Talk:ECC RAM

Note
Before creating a discussion or leaving a comment, please read about using talk pages. To create a new discussion, click here. Comments on an existing discussion should be signed using ~~~~:

A comment [[User:Larry|Larry]] 13:52, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
: A reply [[User:Sally|Sally]] 14:45, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
:: Your reply ~~~~

app-admin/mcelog

Talk status

This discussion is still ongoing.

Is use of app-admin/mcelog still considered best practice on Intel hardware or has it been displaced by better options? —JGaz (talk) 16:08, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Something flagged on IRC

Talk status

This discussion is still ongoing.

A user ("gk") came along on IRC today to flag something they saw as an issue on this article. I don't have time to look into it today, but here is the log in case it makes sense to anyone active on these pages:

ECC_RAM was moved from ECC since "it was specific to that"
but it talks (first place) about CONFIG_MTD_NAND_ECC*
and I strongly believe it has nothing to do with RAM, is needed only for some embedded and it's software error correction
page even suggests: "Make sure CONFIG_MTD_NAND_ECC, CONFIG_MTD_NAND_ECC_SW_HAMMING are enabled at the very least."
rest is more or less OK (about CONFIG_EDAC)
one minor thing is that I believe most people won't ever need CONFIG_EDAC_XILINX_DDR but I may be wrong