Talk:Fcitx

Note
Before creating a discussion or leaving a comment, please read about using talk pages. To create a new discussion, click here. Comments on an existing discussion should be signed using ~~~~:

A comment [[User:Larry|Larry]] 13:52, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
: A reply [[User:Sally|Sally]] 04:27, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
:: Your reply ~~~~

USE flags

Talk status

This discussion is done.

Please don't remove relevant descriptions that actually improve the page. I added them for a reason... — yngwin (wiki admin) (talk) 05:32, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

I removed them, because they are nearly 1:1 the descriptions provided by use.local.desc. Astaecker 07:50, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

But they don't show up here on the Wiki... — yngwin (wiki admin) (talk) 08:16, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Ok. Then I have to update to local *.desc copies (and maybe describe how, too). Astaecker 08:18, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Done. Astaecker 07:50, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Add Fcitx 5 description

Talk status

This discussion is done.

There is an incompatible update for fcitx4 and fcitx5, we need to update this wiki.

maybe. In fact, fcitx4 has already been masked, we only need to use fcitx5. Douglarek (talk) 14:03, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Unclear `dbus` flag reference

Talk status

This discussion is done.

Other than the built-in classic UI, there is also a frontend which integrates into KDE well called Kimpanel (included in kde-plasma/kdeplasma-addons). The dbus flag must be enabled to use Kimpanel.

What dbus flag? On what package?

Pistos (talk) 14:37, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Deleted, indeed unclear. If there are objections, it is recommended to clarify. In fact, I have never cared about this so-called kimpanel. Douglarek (talk) 14:06, 9 December 2024 (UTC)