Talk:NTFS
From Gentoo Wiki
Note
Before creating a discussion or leaving a comment, please read about using talk pages. To create a new discussion, click here. Comments on an existing discussion should be signed using
Before creating a discussion or leaving a comment, please read about using talk pages. To create a new discussion, click here. Comments on an existing discussion should be signed using
~~~~
:
A comment [[User:Larry|Larry]] 13:52, 13 May 2024 (UTC) : A reply [[User:Sally|Sally]] 03:35, 26 January 2025 (UTC) :: Your reply ~~~~
Navigate to first
Proposition to move ntfs3g article content
Talk status
This discussion is done.
this page should be moved to ntfs3g & in kernel ntfs documentation belongs here instead. 666threesixes666 (talk) 21:24, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
- I disagree. There isn't that much information that it warrants two separate pages. I think they can coexist on this one page. — yngwin (wiki admin) (talk) 02:59, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- i disagree with your disagreeing. some people will roll up here and be "like wtf am i reading?" "i go to ntfs page and get ntfs3g information instead" with no explanation to stay away from in kernel ntfs support because it doesn't have write support. someone in irc was pleading with me to not edit wiki pages because i touched this page with out knowing first hand, so now its being discussed instead of done. 666threesixes666 (talk) 11:30, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Paragon NTFS3 driver
Talk status
This discussion is done as of 2023-06-01.
Moved here from bug #822189 5.15 introduces the Paragon NTFS3 driver. The wiki page probably could clarify some things:
- New kernel symbols
- Does it need a different set of userspace tools or not?
--Jonas Stein (talk) 23:50, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
- Kernel symbols are now present in the article. As for user space tools, I believe it does need a new set and they're planning on releasing their tools, but have not done so yet, as far as I can tell. See the FAQ on this page entitled "Are you planning to add any files system utilities? The existing alternatives such as fsck.NTFS/NTFSck and fsck.(v)fat don’t work well, and the community has been waiting for a fix."
- For now, is probably best to create NTFS filesystems with Windows and then mount them with the new driver. --Maffblaster (talk) 19:32, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Don't know what was going on
Talk status
This discussion is done as of Nov 9, 2021.
Brian Evans (Grknight) : Sorry I just tried to remove extra 'this' here: 'The this old driver could overwrite existing files...' I didn't mean to change anything else. You can do it yourself ) — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Finoderi (talk • contribs)